Flux Probe Vs Thermal
Rise test on large Turbogenerators
By Engr. Kanthar
Balanathan
DipEE (UK), GradCert (RelEng-Monash), DipBus&Adm
(Finance-Massey), C.Eng., MIEE,
Former Director of Power Engineering Solutions Pty Ltd,
Consulting Electrical Engineers
Leading Engineer of the World 2006, UK Authority Award
1. General
The author, engineer (A) joined a thermal power station as a Senior
Engineer in Sept 1998. The station had a combination of thermal, gas turbines,
and combined cycle plants. After meeting the staff, the engineer went on a walk
around the station to acquaint himself of the plant. The author has extensive
experience on thermal generators, Gas Turbine generators and large HV motors
and Transformers. As he was ging towards Unit one he observed a consultant who
had a PhD doing a temperature rise test.
2. Plant
The PhD said that he is testing the Unit for rotor short turns by doing the
temperature rise test.
3. Issues
We SriLankan engineers although we did not have sophisticated test gear in
SL in the 70s, we had our own way of testing for vibration detection unless it
requires advanced testing, then the owners will get down foreign experts with
sophisticated equipment. The author decided his Sri Lankan method and found out
the Unit had vibration. He checked the Bentley Nevada computer screen, and the
vibration was above normal.
With some doubts the engineer checked the Pedestal on the excitation side
of the generator. He was not satisfied because he thought that there was
vibration on the pedestal and decided that it could be a “soft Footing”
issue. After analysing he decided to check the Unit file. The unit file had
some interesting information. The unit had been installed with Flux Probe
(FP). The flux probe is similar to the RSO test where the probe will detect
a rotor short of turns. The Unit had the FP wired out to a rf TB.
The engineer then decided to download a series of samples at various loads
the following days after the Consultant had finished his work. The flux probe
was invented by Generatortech, Inc in Ohio.
The engineer analysed the samples and found that there was no indication of
rotor short of turn. The engineer called Ohio and discussed with Mr. David
Albright (DA) who was the inventor of the FB. Those who are interested in
knowing more please refer to site given below. After discussion the Director
asked me to send samples at various loads and he will analyse and send a reply.
The Technical Manager was a mechanical engineer with an additional mechanical
engineer supporting him. The engineer attempted to explain the Station Manager,
Tech Manager. None of them would agree and finally spoke to the Operations
Manager who had a Physics degree (Special) and he agreed. Finally, all agreed
to carry out a vibration test on the pedestal and based on the results came to
conclusion that the pedestal has a “soft footing”. BY this time the engineer (A)
had decided what the real issue was. The previous year (Latter part of the
year) the unit had undergone a rotor refit of rewedging, and the unit had new
BN gear fitted. The engineer (A) concluded that one or two wedge may be tight
fitted which may have caused minor thermal bowing and the soft footing has
caused the vibration. The engineer (A) checked with EPRI reports and found out
that in 1964 a generator in California had similar incident of vibration. The
engineer was already given access to EPRI by the Station.
The company invited an engineer from Bentley Nevada who came and did the
same temperature rise test. After all, the engineer invited the BN engineer for
a meeting at midnight. The discussion was on pros and cons and the engineer (A)
explained with refence to EPRI. Both agreed and the SM was conveyed. The Eng.
(A) was asked to submit a report to the GM.
The rotor was sent to the workshops for refitting with the same rotor bars
but with new insulation. The engineer wanted to be at site when the remove the bars.
One bar was found to have foreign body which caused the tightness.
At site, they found the pedestal base concrete foundation breaking like
biscuits.
The unit was repaired and reinstalled and was online with no vibration. The
engineer (A) has photocopies of all related matters and was happy that he was
correct. The engineer was allowed to practice as an Electrical and mechanical
engineer by the professional body in the UK.
The engineer had published a book also on power systems. Also, the
credibility and competency of the SriLankan engineers in Power Systems.
Contact: http://www.generatortech.com/B-Page2-Theory-Overview.html
Cause of pedestal vibration
Foundation
degradation ・ Bearing pedestal stiffness ・ Natural frequency excitation.
https://turbolab.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Case_Study_11.pdf
Thank you,
28-06-2023
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.