Country’s Growth, Trumpism, Racism to Capture Power

By Engr. Kanthar Balanathan

DipEE (UK), GradCert (RelEng-Monash), DipBus&Adm (Finance-Massey) 

Former Director of Power Engineering Solutions Pty Ltd, Consulting Electrical Engineers

Former Chartered Engineer, UK, Aus, NZ & Zimbabwe

Associate of the Australian Institute of Physics

Leading Engineer of the World 2006, UK Authority Award

 

This has references to the various articles related to a Senator’s racial talks. The last one was about land mines which Madam referred to as the parties’ (One Nation) MPs. However, such talks are irrelevant in politics of a democratic country.

‘I’m going to leave you some landmines’: Pauline Hanson sends SA premier a message amid jubilant supporters | One Nation | The Guardian

Pauline Hanson found to have breached the Racial Discrimination Act with tweet | 9 News Australia

Federal Court finds Senator Pauline Hanson’s tweet to be racially discriminatory - Wotton Kearney

'Green light to violence': Anti-racism commissioner denounces Hanson's remarks | SBS News

Madam could have expressed her vision and mission by using another diplomatic phrase. Australia is not a third world, while we can confidently state that every citizen has acquired political knowledge to a higher level to advance their living standard with abreast of science and technology.

I wish to quote some examples of countries where racial politicians finished up nowhere within a short time.

(1) A politician named Enoc Powell (EP) was in Wolverhampton/Birmingham in the sixties who sprayed racial talks. EP ended up nowhere within a short period and could not achieve his ambitions. I lived in Stafford, UK, during this period.

(2) A politician named K.M.P Rajaratna was spraying similar speeches like that of EP (UK) and people threw him away.

(3) Two political parties in Sri Lanka, SLFP and UNP was struggling to capture power. Basically, third world politicians take up the racial concept to capture political power. SLFP (SWRD Bandaranaike) took up the racial concept and won the election. However, in three years, his own people murdered SWRD Bandaranaike in 1959, and today, SLFP is not heard of. The government today is led by the best president whose vision and mission are for the country’s growth only and unite the entire people.

Today, can we assume that some in Australia is trying to drive wedges between the people to capture power, which in our opinion will never be able to achieve whatever they have in mind? All Australians think that they are Aussies united, irrespective of race, doctrine and ethos.

British citizens are intelligent and practice the reasoning process before they decide. Australian citizens today are mature and have political, economic and technological knowledge. Australians do exercise and advise their children a process of reasoning. It will be hard for anyone to change their mind from righteousness, justice and honesty.  The British and the Europeans do exercise a process reasoning before they execute.

Ref:

1.      Quote: “Perception is an active mental act. It is a dynamic, dialectical conflict between the self-perspective transformation and external vectors of power bearing upon us. That which we perceive is a balance between these antagonists”. (Ref: Understanding Conflict and War: vol. 1: the dynamic psychological field, chapter 11, by R.J. Rummel)

 

2.      Humans perceive different results about the same state, as perceptions vary from person to person. People assign different meanings to what they perceive. This is why conflicts arise. (Kanthar Balanathan)

3.     https://neuronmind.blogspot.com/      The Obligations of a Politician to Society

Principles, Duties, and the Path to Public Trust

Key Elements of Citizenship

• Legal status: Granted by birth, descent, naturalisation, or other legal processes.
• Rights: Voting, holding a passport, access to public services, and legal protections.
• Duties: Obeying laws, paying taxes, serving on juries (in some countries), civic participation.
• Belonging: A citizen is part of the political community of a country.

Comments:

There cannot be a reason to lay landmines in any form to oppose citizens in a country. Let us all unite and build our nation called Australia to the next level in human resource management. Labour Party government can be identified as Peoples party, as the party fulfills the needs of all citizens by taking care of Children, Working class, and aged people via Childcare, Medicare and Aged care. Also, they keep abreast of Science and Technology in pace with the economy. Our Prime Minister Hon Anthony Albanese is an effective and efficient PM who always address the needs of the citizens and the country.

 

The Obligations of a Politician to Society

Principles, Duties, and the Path to Public Trust

Introduction

The role of a politician extends far beyond the act of legislating or governing; it is fundamentally rooted in the trust and well-being of the society they serve. A politician’s obligation to society is a complex web of ethical, legal, and moral responsibilities, encompassing everything from honest representation to the pursuit of the public good. In a world facing increasing challenges—social, economic, environmental, and political—the obligations of politicians have never been more important for the maintenance and progress of democracy.

The Foundation of Obligation: Representation and Service

At the heart of a politician’s duty lies the principle of representation. Elected or appointed, politicians act on behalf of their constituents, entrusted with the power to make decisions that affect the welfare of many. The obligation to represent is not merely procedural; it is both a moral and practical contract with society.

·         Listening to the People: Politicians must remain attuned to the needs, concerns, and aspirations of those they represent. This entails regular communication, transparency, and a willingness to remain accessible.

·         Fairness and Equality: The obligation extends to serving all constituents equally, regardless of background, belief, or social standing. Discrimination, bias, or favouritism undermines public trust and the very fabric of democracy.

Honesty, Integrity, and the Public Trust

A politician’s obligation is inherently tied to trust—a fragile asset that, once lost, is difficult to regain. Politicians are expected to uphold the highest standards of honesty and integrity.

·         Truthfulness: Society depends on politicians to provide accurate information, especially in times of crisis. Misrepresentation or deliberate misinformation can have dire consequences, eroding public trust and impeding progress.

·         Accountability: Politicians are answerable for their actions, decisions, and use of public resources. Accountability mechanisms, such as audits, public disclosures, and independent oversight, ensure that politicians remain faithful to their responsibilities.

·         Transparency: An open and transparent approach to governance enables citizens to understand the reasoning behind decisions, participate meaningfully in public life, and hold their representatives to account.

The Pursuit of the Common Good

While individual interests abound in any society, a politician’s ultimate obligation is to pursue the common good—the well-being of the community as a whole.

·         Balancing Interests: Politicians must weigh competing interests and act in ways that benefit society at large, rather than particular groups or individuals. This may require compromise, negotiation, and a willingness to make difficult decisions.

·         Sustainable Policy: Long-term thinking and planning are crucial. Politicians must consider not only immediate outcomes, but also the sustainability and future impact of their policies. This is particularly evident in issues such as environmental stewardship, economic development, and social welfare.

·         Promotion of Justice: Upholding justice—legal, social, and economic—is a core obligation. Politicians should strive to ensure that systems are fair, accessible, and responsive to the needs of the most vulnerable members of society.

Ethical Leadership and Personal Conduct

Society looks to its leaders as examples of behaviour and character. The obligation of a politician is not limited to policy or legislation, but extends to personal conduct and the cultivation of ethical leadership.

·         Leading by Example: Through their behaviour, politicians set standards for others. Ethical lapses can have ripple effects throughout society, normalising misconduct and eroding civic values.

·         Commitment to Service: Public office is a position of service, not self-enrichment. Politicians have a duty to place the needs of the public above personal gain, to avoid conflicts of interest, and to act with humility.

·         Responsibility in Public Discourse: Politicians shape the tone and quality of public debate. They are obligated to foster civil, respectful, and inclusive dialogue, even in the face of disagreement.

Safeguarding Democracy and the Rule of Law

Democracy relies on the rule of law, the protection of rights and liberties, and robust institutions. Politicians are stewards of these traditions, tasked with defending them for current and future generations.

·         Protecting Rights: Politicians must safeguard the rights and freedoms of all citizens, including those with whom they disagree. This includes protection of free speech, assembly, and belief.

·         Strengthening Institutions: The obligation to uphold and strengthen democratic institutions—parliaments, courts, independent media—is fundamental. Undermining these institutions for political gain weakens the entire society.

·         Respecting the Rule of Law: Even in pursuit of just causes, politicians must operate within the framework of the law, respecting checks and balances and the separation of powers.

Responding to Social Challenges and Change

Society is dynamic, confronting ever-evolving challenges such as technology, demographic shifts, globalisation, and health crises. Politicians are obligated to remain responsive, adaptive, and forward-thinking.

·         Innovation and Resilience: Embracing new ideas and technologies can help address societal challenges. Politicians must encourage innovation while being mindful of ethical implications.

·         Inclusivity and Representation: As societies become more diverse, politicians must ensure that all voices are heard, especially those historically marginalized.

·         Crisis Response: In times of emergency—be it economic, environmental, or health-related—politicians have an obligation to act decisively, communicate clearly, and prioritise the well-being of the public.

Global Responsibility

In an interconnected world, the obligations of politicians transcend national borders. Issues such as climate change, migration, and international security demand cooperation and a sense of shared responsibility.

·         Diplomacy and Cooperation: Politicians must engage with counterparts in other countries to address challenges that affect humanity as a whole.

·         Upholding International Commitments: Honouring treaties, respecting international law, and participating in multilateral organisations are vital aspects of responsible global leadership.

·         Advocacy for Human Rights: Politicians have a duty not only to their own citizens, but also to promote and defend the rights and dignity of people everywhere.

Conclusion

The obligations of a politician to society are profound and far-reaching. They encompass representation, integrity, transparency, and the pursuit of justice and the common good. They demand ethical leadership, respect for the rule of law, and a commitment to democratic principles. In facing the challenges of the present and future, politicians must continually earn the trust of those they serve through actions grounded in responsibility, humility, and a genuine dedication to public service. Only by fulfilling these obligations can politicians hope to contribute to a society that is just, prosperous, and resilient.